Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:43:54 -0500 From: Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Jim Durham <durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? Message-ID: <200112042110.fB4LARW37947@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <200112042040.fB4Keb514245@pgh.nepinc.com> References: <21984.1007486225@winston.freebsd.org> <200112042040.fB4Keb514245@pgh.nepinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 03:40 pm, Jim Durham wrote: > On Tuesday 04 December 2001 12:17 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > I know that only security fixes are supposed to go in RELENG_4, > > > but > > > > You mean RELENG_4_4 I assume. RELENG_4 gets a lot more than just > > security fixes. > > > > - Jordan > > Duh... right. OGS..(Old Guy Syndrome). I actually just did a cvsup > to RELENG_4_4 and it didn't have the fixes. I guess I'll rephrase > my question... "Can we have the patches in REGENG_4_4?". > > I put them in by hand and they looked like they were OK, but I > haven't compiled a kernel yet. > > -Jim OK... ONE MORE TIME 8-) RELENG_4_4 not "REGENG" as above... sigh.. (I'm going over in the corner now) -Jim -- Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112042110.fB4LARW37947>