Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:35:04 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <4ED428B8.8040909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <66539.1322526789@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <66539.1322526789@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <4ED4222E.5010707@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: >> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote: > >>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by >>> default? >> >> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new >> system for at least a decade. >> >> Ideally we could do this for 9.0. > > Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so > that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ? I think WITH_PROFILE is probably a good idea for the tinderbox? -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED428B8.8040909>