Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16:57 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, lev@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel D2500CC motherboard and strange RS232/UART behavior Message-ID: <201304101016.57894.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <55881.1365577455@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <229402991.20130407172016@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru> <55881.1365577455@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:04:15 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1424327083.20130410103010@serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ > es: > >Hello, Poul-Henning. > >You wrote 10 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2013 =E3., 0:52:04: > > > >>> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each > >>> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we > >>> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now > >>> about several UARTs. Something like "multiport" device, bot not > >>> exactly. > >PHK> That is what the puc(4) driver does... > > Yes, for PCI devices only :( > > Yes, it needs to learn to do it from hints for ISA. No, that is that not the right hammer for this. This isn't a single ISA device with two ports (which is what puc(4) is aimed at). -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201304101016.57894.jhb>