Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 13:58:16 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Undefined symbol "___error" Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980514135349.799B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199805140324.NAA22813@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 May 1998, John Birrell wrote: > No, it's "relinked" so that a program will know to use the later libc. > The problem here is not that the libc major number needs to be bumped, > but *all* other libraries that use errno.h need a major number bump. > Bruce pointed this out. > > Bruce wants the change backed out. I haven't heard from anyone else. > Should I bump the major number of all the shared libraries in the > FreeBSD tree? Should I back out the change and forget about making future > objects thread-aware? Should I do nothing? Rre there any other pending changes that can bundled with the major number bump? We do need things to adjust for threads. Regards, Mike Hancock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980514135349.799B-100000>