Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:54:52 +0100 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Message-ID: <1D1F9FB0-F0DE-4E8C-B07D-6C1D63E0F182@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <b1cf29ee9a4442df56a718cedd0516e1@intertainservices.com> References: <507832E3.1050801@quip.cz> <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com> <b1cf29ee9a4442df56a718cedd0516e1@intertainservices.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Den 20/11/2012 kl. 22.03 skrev Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com>: > On 2012-10-12 05:21 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: >>> I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config, >>> but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they >>> are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2. >> >> Hey cool! And FreeBSD-9.1 is on there and doing worse than Linux and >> Dragonfly BSD. I wonder why that is. >> >> Lemme cross post this a little to see what people think. >> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-October/017536.html >>> >>> Graphs are available as PDF attachments >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0002.pdf >>> >>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121010/7996ff88/attachment-0003.pdf > > These numbers show very significant improvements. Any possibility/interests in porting this scheduler to FreeBSD or this too much work? I know many have and still complain about our current scheduler. According to the last PDF, the scheduler is only part of the picture. It seems this email by Matt Dillon sums up the changes: http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-September/017490.html Erik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1D1F9FB0-F0DE-4E8C-B07D-6C1D63E0F182>
