Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 10:07:31 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: gnn@freebsd.org Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr status Message-ID: <4548E263.80104@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <m21woojq32.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <200610301649.26429.davidxu@freebsd.org> <200610302150.05499.davidxu@freebsd.org> <m27iyhll2x.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <200610310718.15763.davidxu@freebsd.org> <m21woojq32.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:18:15 +0800, > David Xu wrote: >> [1 <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (7bit)>] >> On Tuesday 31 October 2006 02:23, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: >>>> I will hack at kernel side, but who will hack userland utilities ? >>>> e.g the /usr/bin/limits program. >>> How hard is that to do? If it's "easy" then I can sign up to do that. >>> >> I think it is not hard, but I think one at least has to hack >> /usr/bin/limits, sh and csh which are in our base system. > > I will take on the task when you have the kernel side in place. > >> I will update them and make them reviewed. >> > > Great! > > Thanks, > George > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-threads@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-threads-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" in a manner of speaking, I wonder if that the thread limit should be just related to the process limit.. i.e. N threads count to be 1 process.. if you use linuxthreads of rfork() then you are limited to the process limit.. why should the other threads be different? just a thought.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4548E263.80104>