Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 23:25:16 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: "Yuri A. Wolf" <subs@ovk.altai.ru> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ntp-4.0.99k23? Message-ID: <20010418232516.V5017@casimir.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191115090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru>; from subs@ovk.altai.ru on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:21:53AM %2B0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104191115090.22782-100000@proxy.obk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:21:53AM +0700, Yuri A. Wolf wrote: > After I upgraded to ntp-4.0.99k_2 I noted that ntp port changed again to > ntp-4.0.99k23. > > Is the 1st one vulnerable? Is the 2d one ok? Neither are vulnerable. -- wca [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63misF47idPgWcsURAsH+AJ9a6jEQi14LrKu0z6Af5/9k5cfJywCcCngZ iZMxVyY8emfOP54KwfMVwGs= =t0eV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010418232516.V5017>