Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:40:15 -0600 (CST) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> To: Eugene Polovnikov <paranoid@brain-fag.org> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103160936490.9691-100000@cody.jharris.com> In-Reply-To: <20010316164016.A52749@zssm.zp.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Eugene Polovnikov wrote: [snip] > > And I agree that when all nos-tun's functions be implemented nos-tun > must go away. One thing I don't like about gif is you have to rebuild the kernel when you want to add another gif interface...or is there another way (besides building it with a huge number up front)? Whereas with nos-tun you just MAKEDEV a new tunnel device and your in business. Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> - Keep on routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0103160936490.9691-100000>