Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 Message-ID: <200306061218.h56CIBij045445@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 00:09:04 -0700 (PDT) >From: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> >To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org >Subject: Way forward with BIND 8 >Reply-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org >... >Because there are over 14k lines of diff between the source for 8.3.5 and >8.4.0, I'm hesitant to import the latter right away. Instead, as the >nominal BIND maintainer, I'm proposing the following plan: [Plan itself elided; it's in the archives....] As someone who tends to be fairly conservative about deploying new software -- especially software that is as critical as name resolution -- the plan Works For Me (tm). Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Based on what I have seen to date, the use of Microsoft products is not consistent with reliability. I recommend FreeBSD for reliable systems.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306061218.h56CIBij045445>