Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:22:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Enkhyl <enkhyl@hayseed.net> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, eivind@yes.no, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4-navigator Makefile ports/www/netscape4-navigator/files md5 netscape.sh ports/www/netscape4-navigator/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9809221720450.1840-100000@hillbilly.hayseed.net> In-Reply-To: <199809221649.SAA05608@gratis.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Sep 1998, Mark Murray wrote: > wrote: > > * 4.05 has security problems (any random web-page can execute anything > > * it pleases, IIRC). This is IMO more important than any other > > * reliability issue. > > > > Duh. Should I just mark it broken then? > > Naah. Even if the software is a bit ropey, as long as it's not > hopelessly broken, let's let the users bang on it. If the software > will not work or of it has a big security hole, then that is a good > cause for marking BROKEN IMO. To provide user input on this, I would concur with Mark. The software isn't "broken" per se, it's just has some, shall we say, interesting "features" :-) -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The Art and Science of Electronic Business cnielsen@scient.com <http://www.scient.com>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9809221720450.1840-100000>