Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:16:01 +0200 From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>, "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com>, freebsd-mips@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR]RT305xF support, w/o attachment Message-ID: <20110321011601.6e72f00f.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimUJBqTGaiKcW_nyTq-DAy5gdAyWpz4drQGC_9t@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110314162936.d3f8fd5b.ray@dlink.ua> <AANLkTikOuOCmZxJu8J38ZdeXH-FFRJoPvbhLKi_ZkbQs@mail.gmail.com> <20110320222859.4cf96caf@gmail.com> <AANLkTimUJBqTGaiKcW_nyTq-DAy5gdAyWpz4drQGC_9t@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 05:59:45 +0800 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 21 March 2011 04:28, Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Last patch from Aleksandr 'works fine for me', so... may be rt2860 > > should be replaced to 'rt' for example ? > > rt0: flags= blah-blah-blah IHMO looks more .....nice(?) than > > rt28600: flags= > > > > Yup, that's a good idea. Aleksandr, can you please do that? Off-course I can, but seems better name will be rtw or rtn, because we already have if_rt (for RT3052 ether) which have iface name "rt". I think "rtn" is best. Maybe someone have better? > > > Adrian -- Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110321011601.6e72f00f.ray>