Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:29:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Jem Matzan <jem@thejemreport.com> Cc: "'freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org'" <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Performance comparison, ULE vs 4BSD and AMD64 vs i386 Message-ID: <20040225182959.GF7567@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <403BD508.7080307@thejemreport.com> References: <1077658664.92943.15.camel@.rochester.rr.com> <20040224215847.GC6356@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <403BCA6B.2050908@thejemreport.com> <200402241736.55911.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <403BD508.7080307@thejemreport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:49:44PM -0500, Jem Matzan wrote: > Ah -- I wasn't considering all of the possibilities. It was the AMD64 > form i386 crossbuild that wasn't working for me (while actually trying > to turn a working i386 system into an AMD64 build -- it was the > installworld that failed and broke everything to hell. Now I remember). That is a TOTALLY different thing. Cross building works fine, installing the cross built bits on a 2nd machine is reported to work. Doing an in-place migration from 32-bit to 64-bit on an AMD64 isn't at all supported [at this time].
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040225182959.GF7567>