Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 23:23:27 -0400 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV Cc: proff@suburbia.net, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay), freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest -current upgrade and CFS Message-ID: <199705020323.XAA09983@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 1997 07:44:04 PDT." <199705011444.HAA16684@bach.ca.sandia.gov> References: <199705011444.HAA16684@bach.ca.sandia.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is probably a stupid question, but it seems to me that if you take out > all the crypto parts of CFS, all that's left is a framework that takes > filesystem data, runs it through a transform, and makes it available to the > filesystem at a different mountpoint. Why is that forbidden? > > (Slap me upside the head if this is straying too far from -current topics.) > Yeah, I thought it would be neat to take this part of CFS and a bit of SAMBA so that you could mount a remote Win95 or NT file system using SMB. louie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705020323.XAA09983>