Date: 5 May 2003 14:29:45 -0000 From: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas Seck) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default! Message-ID: <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20030505052615.R2996@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Doug Barton (DougB@freebsd.org):
> I'm completely uninterested in what other OSes do in this regard. We've
> been doing a fairly good job in -current of tightening up the default
> install. I see this as a big step in the wrong direction.
I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option.
Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in
sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was
always part of the default installation set anyway?
--Thomas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030505142945.15738.qmail>