Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:02:54 -0400 From: Winston Smith <smith.winston.101@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Beaglebone black network performance Message-ID: <CADH-AwEvjRx%2B3XZZuGYeLWsGdsDQOTGxXzSpmrBHjufDrNC4yA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AFVwzGXxpYXzjq5j3Up0mj8nwg6H_rsdELjvjevfvoTyw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAcX-AFVwzGXxpYXzjq5j3Up0mj8nwg6H_rsdELjvjevfvoTyw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:47 PM, =C3=96zkan KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> w= rote: > Rasberry PI's network performance is about 6-7Mbit/s, and ping latencies > are about 10-20 milliseconds. I think it's too high. I used iperf for > bandwidth testing. The RPi's 10/100 ethernet controller is connected to the BCM2835 SoC via it's USB controller, so the USB controller has to share it's bandwidth between the peripherals. The BBB also has a 10/100 ethernet, but it's directly supported by the SoC, so the performance *should* be a little better, particularly when there's other USB traffic.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADH-AwEvjRx%2B3XZZuGYeLWsGdsDQOTGxXzSpmrBHjufDrNC4yA>