Date: 21 Dec 2002 11:31:55 -0800 From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Review change on committer's handbook Message-ID: <nvd6nv4190.6nv@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20021221161720.57251.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> + <para>Send mail to &a.portmgr; with the repo copy
> + request listing the reasons for it. First, &a.portmgr;
> + will evaluate it. Next, &a.cvs; will do a repository
> + copy from the old location/name to the new location/name
> + if &a.portmgr; approves it. You will then receive a
> + notice, at which point you are expected to perform
> + the following:</para>
I have only quibbles, but since you seem to care...
If "repo" is an accepted abbreviation, use it in both places; else
use the full word in both places. Or at least use the full word before
using the abbreviation.
The second sentence would read better to me as:
Next, if &a.portmgr; approves it, &a.cvs; will do a repository copy
from the old location/name to the new location/name.
(It seems more chronological, in some weak sense, in your series of
steps.)
BTW: Is "location/name" necessary? I'd think "Location" would suffice.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?nvd6nv4190.6nv>