Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:06 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS Message-ID: <81920.989570646@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 May 2001 18:34:03 %2B1000." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105111832360.533-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105111832360.533-100000@besplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evan s writes: >> Blame the poor design of mount(2) (and ask Adrian when he fixes >> it :-) > >It must be the excellent design of mount(2) that makes it so easy to >do things with it where it can be used :-). Just too bad it wasn't designed so that it can be used from kernel processes as well :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81920.989570646>