Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:18:46 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, rwatson@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTF patch for testing/review Message-ID: <20100327101846.5b4d6b18@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100326.102344.364422370204095721.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20100326101524.15695bisy2324t8g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100326.093717.857133809997909007.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100326171241.16524bklcroedou8@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100326.102344.364422370204095721.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:23:44 -0600 (MDT)
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> In message: <20100326171241.16524bklcroedou8@webmail.leidinger.net>
> Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes:
[entry in build(7)]
> : I will have a look at it next week. As I'm not a native english
> : speaker, you can expect another patch for review (text suggestions for
> : build.9 are welcome, I will take care about the mdoc markup then).
>
Note, it's build(7), not build(9). At least, I find no build(9) on
my -current system installed two days ago.
> How does this text look (posted so everybody can kibitz):
>
> WITH_CTF the build process will run the DTrace CTF conversion
> tools on built objects. Please note that this WITH_
> option is handled differently than all other WITH_
> options (there's no WITHOUT_CTF, or corresponding
==> there is - no contractions, please
> MK_CTF in the build system).
>
Otherwise it looks OK to me.
--
Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100327101846.5b4d6b18>