Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:11:53 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/tinderbox/etc current.rc Message-ID: <20040316091153.GG97962@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <xzpptbdkwaa.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200403160024.i2G0OssC029519@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040316084538.GB97962@ip.net.ua> <xzpptbdkwaa.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 09:53:33AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes: > > Can successful building with -O2 guarantee that the -O build would > > also be successful? > > I believe so, but -O0 is a different story. > Some kernel configs aren't even compilable with -O0 (see the recent ip_output.c commit for one example). Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAVsTZUkv4P6juNwoRAtn2AJsFOXmYSj1w90zTFy4okx591QSwAACgitiv VQqfMwk4fSvH8ivuM1W8R0w= =Aj5Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040316091153.GG97962>