Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:36:25 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.org> To: Rasputin <rasputin@submonkey.net> Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, dirk@FreeBSD.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tomcat port (PATCH) Message-ID: <200201280836.g0S8aP833805@zaphod.euronet.nl> In-Reply-To: <20011121110415.A12931@shikima.mine.nu> References: <20011119161722.A56021@shikima.mine.nu> <200111201351.fAKDpBZ24104@zaphod.euronet.nl> <20011121110415.A12931@shikima.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rasputin,
Does the new patch do what you would like it to do? Missing anything?
Ernst
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 12:04, Rasputin wrote:
> How does this look for a patch?
> It needs a fair bit more work, but at present it:
>
> 1] makes a dependency on 'javac' rather than an explicit path -
> so long as there is a java compiler in your path, it should work.
>
> 2] makes files/patch-aa correctly set java_home in workers.properties
> (dependant on JAVA_HOME; I have a symlink, /usr/java, that I repoint to
> /usr/local/jdk1,1,8, /usr/local/linux-jdk1.3.1 or whatever other JDK I'm
> using that day)
>
> 3] Makes tomcat.sh rc script correctly read JAVA_HOME
> (overridable by 'make JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.1.8' or whatever)
>
> It also has a couple of *really* clanky post-extract targets in the
> Makefile - I don't know a cleaner way of doing it.
>
> I've tried un/reinstalling it , playing around with a JAVA_HOME
> environment variable set to various things, along with explicitly setting
> it on the commnad line, and it seems ok -
> If this looks OK I'll send-pr it.
--
Ernst de Haan
EuroNet Internet B.V.
"Come to me all who are weary and burdened
and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201280836.g0S8aP833805>