Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:44:39 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Peter Jeremy <jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: telnetd 
Message-ID:  <199907182344.RAA75607@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:00:14 %2B1000." <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au> 
References:  <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes:
: There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system.  I
: have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the
: ifdef's in the main code tree.

True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure that there are
no security implications to some of the paths, doing that would be
useless, since that wouldn't be what is checked into the system.  We
really don't need the ifdefs for solaris, cray, etc, do we?

Warner




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907182344.RAA75607>