Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:46:27 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru> To: Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Problem with default ACLs and mask Message-ID: <20051018154627.GB95892@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <4354E644.7090608@ant.uni-bremen.de> References: <434F4FF8.9050903@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20051014064145.GA40856@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <434F9DAE.6070607@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20051014134820.GA43849@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20051014203021.L66014@fledge.watson.org> <435351F7.10101@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20051017141609.GA83692@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4354D850.8060908@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20051018112135.GA94670@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4354E644.7090608@ant.uni-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >>>>Why is the write bit of the mask reset when removing write perms for > >>>>group? Is this really intended? > >>> > >>> > >>>Yes, it is intended, whether it was a good idea or not. > > > > > > [dd] > > > > > >>Very sad :-( It really seems to be impossible to implment something like > >>a "Group Manager" enabling me to delegate priviliges for a group of > >>users to some non-root person. > > > > > > What OS allows you to do it? > > > I have done such things with OpenVMS. Dunno how much control > Windows/NTFS allows. Doesn't OpenVMS also have the concept of default ACLs on directories? How is the matter handled there? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018154627.GB95892>