Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 10:07:02 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: tcobb@staff.circle.net Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UNION FS appropriate? Message-ID: <19980310100702.65530@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980309232825.19080C-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:30:51PM -0800 References: <8188AD2EBC3CD111B7A30060082F32A40C3FA3@freya.circle.net> <Pine.BSF.3.95.980309232825.19080C-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 09, 1998 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > You don't need chroot. I'm fairly certain Julian is trying to say 'union' here, just to clear up any confusion. > Have a single copy of each binary on the server, but have a link (hard > link) to each chroot directory. > that way you only need one copy of each. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980310100702.65530>