Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 11:30:34 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, FreeBSD-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 15.0-ALPHA3 update did not update any FreeBSD-set-*.pkg files in https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ ? Message-ID: <2137C048-C9FD-4C4E-97EF-EFBC187437F5@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <0C369B1C-C86C-4BB0-8237-3863B8BD4A1B@yahoo.com> References: <DAB662E4-AE29-4831-821D-EC87EEB50BF7.ref@yahoo.com> <DAB662E4-AE29-4831-821D-EC87EEB50BF7@yahoo.com> <aNA81pKaXHMdr2Mm@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <0C369B1C-C86C-4BB0-8237-3863B8BD4A1B@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[Just fising some wording.] On Sep 21, 2025, at 11:17, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sep 21, 2025, at 10:58, Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Mark Millard wrote in <DAB662E4-AE29-4831-821D-EC87EEB50BF7@yahoo.com>: >>> Looking at https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ shows >>> 9 files updated to have FreeBSD-*-15.0.a3.*.pkg names. The rest still >>> have FreeBSD-*-15.0.a2.*.pkg names. The 9 FreeBSD-*-15.0.a3.*.pkg are: >> >> the timestamp on these packages indicate they were built after ALPHA2, >> but before newvers.sh was updated to ALPHA3. most likely, re@ ran the >> build several times before updating newvers.sh and did not clean the >> package repository in the interim. >> >> as long as the contents are correct, this has no impact on pkg, and it's >> expected that the base repository will have different package versions >> because we only update packages which actually changed. > > I'm confused by that statement. The below example is not > based on 15.0, but some material from prior main 16 > reporting related to FreeBSD-set-* vintages and content, > where some FreeBSD-set-* had not been updated, in this > case FreeBSD-set-src : > > deps: { > FreeBSD-src: { > origin: "base", > version: "16.snap20250919160159" > }, > FreeBSD-src-sys: { > origin: "base", > version: "16.snap20250919160159" > } > } > > If the FreeBSD-set-src involved for such is > older than the actual FreeBSD-src and > FreeBSD-src-sys distributed, the "version:" > fields are out of date, as they were in the > main 16 example in question. > > If they are ignored/unused and do not track > updates, why are they even present? Fixing that last statement to be explicit and adding another question: If the "version:" fields in a FreeBSD-set-* are ignored/unused and do not track update to members of the FreeBSD-set-* in question, then why are the "version:" fields even present in the data for the FreeBSD-set-* ? Are the "version:" fields being out of date and example of: contents are incorrect ? === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.comhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2137C048-C9FD-4C4E-97EF-EFBC187437F5>