Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:33:40 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 release on September 25th Message-ID: <20000917143340.W47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <8934.969215053@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 11:24:13AM -0700 References: <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> <8934.969215053@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 11:24:13AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> Sigh. People do seem to be ignoring the "assigned to" field in the
> PRs, something we only fill in when it's truly obvious that the
> problem is wholly within the responsibility domain of a given
> committer or not something that anyone else can even hope to
> fix.
There is a direct correlation between the Submitter being ignored by
the Assigned To and the Submitter ignoring the Assigned To.
I don't blame the contributor community for being a little more
then pissed recently for having PRs with full explanations,
how-to-repeats, and patches that work being ignored by unresponsive
maintainers.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc.
billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000917143340.W47559>