Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:40:04 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPv6 route mutex recursion (crash) and fix Message-ID: <y7v1xgrjyt7.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> In-Reply-To: <20040923185841.GD959@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040922020957.GE84424@green.homeunix.org> <y7vu0tokekl.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <20040923185841.GD959@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(resending, since the first attempt seems to have failed due to some DNS-related error) >>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400, >>>>> Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> said: >> So, as a result, I tend to think the proposed patch is a reasonable >> fix to the problem. But please add the rationale as comments, since >> the background intent is a bit vague as shown by the question from >> George. > Thank you for your review. As you certainly are more knowledgable in KAME > code than I am, would you mind redoing this so that the style is more > closely matched; then I could take the change from the KAME repository? I'm willing to help you, but please let me check to be sure. Are you asking me to modify the KAME snap code based on your patch first, which you'll then merge back to FreeBSD? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7v1xgrjyt7.wl>