Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:01:25 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        jack <jacko@xtalwind.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: I'm re-rolling the 2.1.5 release. 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960716235136.19524A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199607161850.MAA15306@rover.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Warner Losh wrote:

> I hate to say this, but shouldn't it become the 2.1.5.1R release?
> 
> 1/2 :-)
> 
> Warner
> 

It might not be too bad - the Linux camp won't even have another bait - 
and it would be perfectly honest. 2.1.5-RELEASE is and was, but we 
(st. core team and all the rest of us) do not recomend it and it does 
not get distributed on a CD. 2.1.5.1 goes to the CD and on the ftp sites
everything but the different bits will be links - additional space would 
come only from files which will actually change (some in the bin dist +
possibly some others).

But I don't think it is too bad if it just remains 2.1.5... OK with me.

	Sander

PS. If you want this to make it to the list - please forward it! 
(otherwise it will most probably time out).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960716235136.19524A-100000>