Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1996 00:01:25 +0300 (EET DST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: jack <jacko@xtalwind.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: I'm re-rolling the 2.1.5 release. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960716235136.19524A-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <199607161850.MAA15306@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, Warner Losh wrote: > I hate to say this, but shouldn't it become the 2.1.5.1R release? > > 1/2 :-) > > Warner > It might not be too bad - the Linux camp won't even have another bait - and it would be perfectly honest. 2.1.5-RELEASE is and was, but we (st. core team and all the rest of us) do not recomend it and it does not get distributed on a CD. 2.1.5.1 goes to the CD and on the ftp sites everything but the different bits will be links - additional space would come only from files which will actually change (some in the bin dist + possibly some others). But I don't think it is too bad if it just remains 2.1.5... OK with me. Sander PS. If you want this to make it to the list - please forward it! (otherwise it will most probably time out).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960716235136.19524A-100000>