Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:26:31 +0200 From: Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] if_ath_tx: change interrupt scheduling deferral Message-ID: <CAAUsrB5_EDJECAMfS5qrAjPXzmW-0y8vgHd=5C18H=gyqebT3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokMvNiHe_XjoSNFfsnnY1%2BfdmaepsN8gqz8yRLvz=sysQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmoknpF_RhiXWL07GSOqWoHpy3L5Ma4kCptHq9MtfbfPO8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUsrB4KYaH-uyG_1BiGywZ%2BGOP%2BmBpnw3UO15c767vfQmC5BA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokMvNiHe_XjoSNFfsnnY1%2BfdmaepsN8gqz8yRLvz=sysQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 11 September 2011 00:48, Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> wrote: > > > i tested new patches and can tell that works ok. i don't see any error > > messages in logfile for both cards (high trafic load). regarding to > > anything i tested (HT20/40) iperf shows > > Sweet. > > > TCP ~ 9.8MB/s UPD ~ 13MB/s on HT/20 . > > TCP ~ 13MB/s UDP ~ 19.7MB/s on HT/40 > > > > this results are when AR5416 act as iperf server and AR9280 as client, in > > another case results are worse. > > AR5416 works in sta and AR9280 in hostap mode. > > that's all for now :) > > Yeah; things get a bit unpredictable at times. I'll do some further > digging to try and understand why. > I still think it's a dodgy mix of issues with periodic calibration and > rate control. > > I'm still working out the kinks with my current patch. I'll post > another one shortly for you (and others!) to try. > > Finally, have you seen any device timeouts? Or odd traffic hangs? > > Thanks, > > > Adrian > as i mention before . no errors at any tipe .. Beri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAUsrB5_EDJECAMfS5qrAjPXzmW-0y8vgHd=5C18H=gyqebT3A>