Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:14:34 +1000 From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au> To: W Gerald Hicks <gehicks@cisco.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Message-ID: <3B25CF6A.F871E2EE@quake.com.au> References: <Pine.A41.3.96.1010612000229.84080E-100000@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU> <3B25CAEC.27AF9D30@cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W Gerald Hicks wrote: > > <RANT> > No. Threads like this are completely wasting the time of people who use > it for its chartered purposes. The feedback process is centered on the > proper use of send-pr. > > Truth is, this thread is a pulverised mass of dead horse flesh that has > been beat for years by people expecting a free operating system to > conform to some mental model they have formed in absence of what has > actually been communicated by the project. > > Cripes people, the CVS repository is available for people to be able to > slide back and forth in time as necessary. It only requires a tiny bit > of competence. For fair effort on your part you also gain a fair amount > of liberty along with a system that has literally made computing history > in terms of stability. On top of that, it's free. > </RANT> > > Can this stupid thread please die now? Threads like this come up every few months, I just try to ignore them and hope they go away :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B25CF6A.F871E2EE>