Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:45:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, jbryant@unix.tfs.net, peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposal to not change time_t Message-ID: <199808192245.RAA14775@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <199808191523.JAA20095@mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Wed, 19 Aug 1998 09:23:26 -0600) References: <199808190235.VAA12287@unix.tfs.net> <199808190503.WAA01910@usr06.primenet.com> <199808191523.JAA20095@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ps. The reason NetBSD doesn't have this is the same reason their CVS > tree is not public. The code in their CVS tree is *still* pre-Lite > bits, let alone Lite/Lite2. (Though I suspect they've imported some > of the bits from both, though obviously not all of them.....) Which reminds me... What OS's out there *are* Lite2-based? Just us and BSD/I? -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808192245.RAA14775>