Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:11:28 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r272515 - projects/ipfw/sys/netpfil/ipfw
Message-ID:  <201410091711.28587.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <5436B52E.3010106@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201410041210.s94CAX7I012628@svn.freebsd.org> <5520708.eFNh9vYom7@ralph.baldwin.cx> <5436B52E.3010106@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, October 09, 2014 12:17:50 pm Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> On 06.10.2014 19:45, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 04, 2014 12:10:33 PM Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >> Author: melifaro
> >> Date: Sat Oct  4 12:10:32 2014
> >> New Revision: 272515
> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272515
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>    Add "ipfw_ctl3" FEATURE to indicate presence of new ipfw interface.
> >>
> >> Modified:
> >>    projects/ipfw/sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw2.c
> >>
> >> Modified: projects/ipfw/sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw2.c
> >> ============================================================================
> >> == --- projects/ipfw/sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw2.c	Sat Oct  4 11:40:35
> >> 2014	(r272514) +++ projects/ipfw/sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw2.c	Sat Oct  4
> >> 12:10:32 2014	(r272515) @@ -2874,6 +2874,7 @@ static moduledata_t ipfwmod =
> >> {
> >>   #define	IPFW_VNET_ORDER		(IPFW_MODEVENT_ORDER + 2) /* Later still. */
> >>
> >>   DECLARE_MODULE(ipfw, ipfwmod, IPFW_SI_SUB_FIREWALL, IPFW_MODEVENT_ORDER);
> >> +FEATURE(ipfw_ctl3, "ipfw new sockopt calls");
> >>   MODULE_VERSION(ipfw, 2);
> >>   /* should declare some dependencies here */
> > Would it be better to bump the module version to 3 instead?  Userland programs
> > can then use modfind() and modstat() to determine the version.
> I've bumped ipfw module version in r272828. Actually, I've entirely 
> forgotten about this possibility.
> However, it is a bit hard to determine module version inside 
> (perl|python|sh|any) script.
> On the other case, FEATURE framework provides nice and easy way to 
> determine any "feature" status
> both in C and interpreted programs.

I'll grant you that feature is convenient.  Perhaps create a SYSCTL node though that
holds the current version?  That is 'foo.ipfw.version' being 2 or 3 is more future
proof than 'feature.ipfw2/3/4'.

Alternatively, we could change the module code to export a dynamic sysctl tree
for all loaded modules that includes the versions, i.e. 'module.<foo>.version', etc.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201410091711.28587.jhb>