Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:37:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s boot0sio.s Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404271435410.48609-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <58076.1083096035@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed? It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks. The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C preprocessor. (or did I get this the other way around :-) > > If we have such a convention: yes. I wasn't aware of it. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0404271435410.48609-100000>