Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:38:51 -0500 From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> To: yanefbsd@gmail.com Cc: giffunip@tutopia.com, drosih@rpi.edu, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it becomestandard compiler?) Message-ID: <090202163851.AA93299.SM@caleb.INS.CWRU.Edu> In-Reply-To: Message from yanefbsd@gmail.com of Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:20:16 -0800 (id <7d6fde3d0902020020n3d5aac5cu4f3381a195d6fdcf@mail.gmail.com>) References: <87223.61659.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <p06240803c5ac33499e88@128.113.24.47> <7d6fde3d0902020020n3d5aac5cu4f3381a195d6fdcf@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It all depends on what features people choose to use in GNU's readline > that makes it compatible or not with libedit. ...which means that it's not a drop-in readline replacement. And here we are -- back where we started. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?090202163851.AA93299.SM>