Date: 19 Sep 1999 17:04:42 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su> Cc: imura@FreeBSD.org (R. Imura), cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <vqcr9juo3c5.fsf@bubble.didi.com> In-Reply-To: Andrey Zakhvatov's message of "Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:44:00 %2B0600 (ESS)" References: <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su>
* And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
* ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff?
* I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
* What your opinions?
For X-only stuff, ${X11BASE} is fine of course. For stuff that has
both X and non-X versions (or the same binary that runs in text mode
when DISPLAY is not set), ${LOCALBASE} it is.
Of course, as Chuck said, some applications that use imake won't give
you a choice.
Satoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcr9juo3c5.fsf>