Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:22:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net>
To:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Cc:        forrestc@imach.com
Subject:   Re: Best alternative to asp
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010231813230.6874-100000@veager.siteplus.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Forrest W. Christian Wrote:

>What most people miss is that ASP != ASP.

>I use the apache::asp module, and it works great.  HOWEVER, it is what I
>call Perl/ASP, meaning the underlying language is perl.

>Chilisoft's solution is a unix implementation of what I 
>call (visual?)basic/ASP.  This is what most people consider asp.

I understand the difference in what drives these two different
approaches.  What I don't understand is what differences it makes in the
application code.  I am afraid that my reluctance to use M$ products is to
blame for my ignorance on the subject.

--
Jim Weeks




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010231813230.6874-100000>