Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:33:55 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, alc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nginx and FreeBSD11 Message-ID: <20160922093355.GZ2840@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20160922085320.GQ38409@kib.kiev.ua> References: <20160920065244.GO2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920192053.GP2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920201925.GI38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160920203853.GR2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160920211517.GJ38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922075933.GL38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922082527.GX2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160922082740.GN38409@kib.kiev.ua> <20160922083424.GY2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160922085320.GQ38409@kib.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:53:20AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:34:24AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:59:33AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > Below is, I believe, the committable fix, of course supposing that > > > > > the patch above worked. If you want to retest it on stable/11, ignore > > > > > efirt.c chunks. > > > > > > > > and remove patch w/ spinlock? > > > Yes. > > > > What you prefer now -- I am test spinlock patch or this patch? > > For success in any case need wait 2-3 days. > > If you already run previous (spinlock) version for 1 day, then finish > with it. I am confident that spinlock version results are indicative for > the refined patch as well. > > If you did not applied the spinlock variant at all, there is no reason to > spend efforts on it, use the patch I sent today. No, I am did not applied the spinlock variant at all. OK, try this patch. Do you still need first 100 lines from verbose boot?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160922093355.GZ2840>