Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:26:16 -0400 From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) Message-ID: <3906C448.825BAD84@vangelderen.org> References: <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252346240.331-100000@picnic.mat.net> <20000425234016.D1022@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > FOLLOWS UP DIRECTED THERE. PLEASE *REMOVE* cvs-all & cvs-committers from > > this thread. [...] > cvs-all doesn't appear to be a real mailing list, be we all know that > there are about 200 people there. That means nearly 900 people on the > (mutually exclusive) cvs lists, at least another 800 over in -current, > less than 500 in -arch. You can't force a committer to join -arch, > which is why I still prefer -committers. Correct me if I'm wrong but I have the feeling that architectural discussions are off-topic on -commits and perfectly on-topic on -arch. I have to admit that I seem unable to find a list charter for -commits but it seems unlikely that it would be the same as the charter for -arch. You surely aren't saying that you want people to post to the wrong list just because you don't feel like joining -arch? Nobody is forcing you to join -arch, but you have to if you want to have "Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture" . Keep in mind that by having architectural discussions on -commits you are annoying people that are just interested in commit msgs. Or maybe the various charters need revision? Cheers, Jeroen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3906C448.825BAD84>