Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:53:52 +0300
From:      Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com>
To:        Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Cc:        Morgan Reed <morgan.s.reed@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Accessing tun devices from inside a Jail
Message-ID:  <4EA2CAF0.3070600@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA2B15A.3020509@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <CAKnh_YvwLXZarqUKjW_dT_S1h9frA=KspxMqy%2BOR36yuSv8rXg@mail.gmail.com> <76ADAE81-7725-4139-86D9-D1A9E50E5B56@lassitu.de> <4EA1FE05.9040304@gmx.com> <FCF22B48-768C-4477-B871-B085BC0EE57A@lassitu.de> <4EA2B15A.3020509@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/22/2011 3:04 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/10/2011 12:49, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Am 22.10.2011 um 01:19 schrieb Nikos Vassiliadis:
>>
>>>> On 10/21/2011 5:08 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>>>>> - VIMAGE and mpd don't like each other, so VIMAGE was out as well
>>>>
>>>> Could you explain please? In my limited testing they seem to get along fine:)
>> Sorry, I misremembered.  The issue is actually pf and VIMAGE.  A couple of years back, there were issues with VIMAGE and netgraph, but those seem to have been resolved.
>
> pf and VIMAGE seems to have been fixed in 9.0

No, it's not ready yet, but the version of pf in 9.0 is VIMAGE
compatible and I *think* is mostly usable in a single-instance
scenario.

For more than one pf instance, I am using two patches which are in
GNATS if you want to try them.

Nikos



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA2CAF0.3070600>