Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:25:07 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Wen Heping <wen@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/moinmoin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20110120092507.GA82095@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <70181583@serv3.int.kfs.ru> References: <201101180845.p0I8jubc025995@repoman.freebsd.org> <70181583@serv3.int.kfs.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:32:16PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Wen Heping <wen@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>
> > wen 2011-01-18 08:45:56 UTC
> >
> > - Add license
> -----
> > +LICENSE= GPLv2
> > +LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/docs/licenses/COPYING
> -----
>
> This is a general question, just picking this commit up.
> Should we provide the license text if it's a standard one?
> My vote is "no"...
I would also said no. In fact, I find it abusive and wrong to use the
LICENSE_FILE at all for standard licenses. Then problem is that people
don't care, and we (ports people) do not do enough to educate them, and
even sometimes encourage mistakes by committing bad submissions.
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110120092507.GA82095>