Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:58:56 -0500 (EST)
From:      spork <spork@super-g.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: status of NFS?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812111758220.27962-100000@super-g.inch.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812111525000.6967-100000@super-g.inch.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
An addendum...  Any idea what causes this?

root@shell[/home/spork]# mount
/dev/sd0s1a on / (local)
/dev/sd0s1d on /tmp (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0s1e on /usr (local, nodev)
/dev/sd0s1f on /usr/local (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0s1g on /usr/local/tars (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd0s1h on /var (local, nodev, nosuid)
/dev/sd1s1e on /staff (NFS exported, local, nodev)
/dev/sd1s1f on /home (NFS exported, local, nodev, nosuid)
procfs on /proc (local)
10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid)
10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid)
10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid)               

???  Weird.

Charles

---
Charles Sprickman
spork@super-g.com
--- 

On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, spork wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're getting ready to replace two important production machines running
> 2.1.7.1 with two running our stable snap (980825).  We currently run nfs
> between them to allow shell users to read mail locally (yes, I know about
> IMAP, but the solution we have works well now...).  Basically the mail
> server export /var/mail to the shell machine and the shell machine exports
> /home so user's procmailrc's can be read, etc.  NFS is over a private
> 100Mb network on a second nic.
> 
> I'd just like to get a feel from everyone as to what the best options for
> NFS in this situation are.  Right now, even with "soft" and "intr" flags,
> I get un-killable processes should one of the mounts go away.  Generally,
> reboots are required to get everything back in sync after a failure.  I'm
> now using a line like so:
> 
> 10.0.0.1:/var/mail      /var/mail       nfs 
> rw,bg,intr,soft,nfsv3,tcp,nosuid,nodev,noexec
> 
> Looking at the archives, people seem to have better luck with v2 over udp.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Charles
> 
> ---
> Charles Sprickman
> spork@super-g.com
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9812111758220.27962-100000>