Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:48:31 -0300 From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> To: "Adrian Penisoara" <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Cc: Sabeeh Baig <baigsabeeh@gmail.com>, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xen Status Message-ID: <e71790db0808210548h792bd6cdg9915dd38580d2b5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0808202351s2ff2aa04va6ba44cffb28cdf7@mail.gmail.com> References: <de2964020808201912x19be2efby820c1994e0cafcf8@mail.gmail.com> <78cb3d3f0808202351s2ff2aa04va6ba44cffb28cdf7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> wrote: > Hi, > > Xen (DomU support) has recently started its life in HEAD (FreeBSD-CURRENT). > > Follow this thread under freebsd-hackers: > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?g8962l$q9l$1 > > I agree with you that we need more virtualization offerings in order > to keep the [Free]BSD platform interesting for the users. I guess > we'll have to push harder vendors like VMware, Sun (xVM/VirtualBox), > etc. ... > For VMware support, see also : > http://www.rofug.ro/article.php/fbsd_as_vmware_host_vote > > Regards, > Adrian. I'd not expect anything from VMware in the foreseeable future. VirtualBox is open source now but someone with enough knowledge and time would have to work on porting it to FreeBSD. The hardest part of the work would be porting the kernel module, I guess. (CC to the list, now) -- If you think things can't get worse it's probably only because you lack sufficient imagination.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e71790db0808210548h792bd6cdg9915dd38580d2b5>