Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:55:16 -0500 From: "Guy Helmer" <ghelmer@palisadesys.com> To: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>, "Eric Anderson" <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: <dan@langille.org>, <security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-01:55.procfs Message-ID: <HEEHKIJOHDLFOOEBABJIGEDNCAAA.ghelmer@palisadesys.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1010822094737.66196A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew R. Reiter [mailto:arr@watson.org] wrote > Hurm. I had assumed always that "security-officer" was more than one > person and that these people, not necesarily the FreeBSD "security team" > (if one wishes to call it that), should be those who review the > patch/advisory. Bah, perhaps I just hear things ... I am sure "security-officer" is more than one person but a little more "peer review" could apparently help the advisory process. Guy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?HEEHKIJOHDLFOOEBABJIGEDNCAAA.ghelmer>