Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:53:36 +0000 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20040823085336.GC78296@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040823084716.GA88989@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200408230644.i7N6iVKx061706@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040823084716.GA88989@abigail.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:47:16AM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > Add a few <application> tags around KerberosIV inside titles. > > > > Previously, Kerberos5 was printed in bold in the table of contents > > while KerberosIV was not. > > > > I understand the reason of the change: consistency. > However I wonder if it's a good idea to use application tags in titles. > For the moment only few applications inside titles are tagged and, of > course, the TOC is not really consistent on this point. > Any opinion? I just added : (element (title application) (process-children)) to my local stylesheet because I think that the bold application names look poor in the titles -- this just overrides the freebsd.dsl bold setting for <application> when it is inside a <title>. I also think that <command>s look better in italics than the small monospaced font we used when they show up in titles. - Murray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040823085336.GC78296>