Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 14:52:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is -STABLE broken ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008161450540.17478-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <399A6E81.7615812D@qualys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> It's weird because signal 4 is SIGILL, and means that an illegal
> instruction has been caught. (exception #6 if I remember right). So it
> looks like a bug in the compiler.
> Here is my uname -a ouput :
You forgot to mention what CPU - most likely thing is that you built the
compiler using CPU optimizations which dont work for your CPU, like using
-march=pentium on a 486 :-)
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008161450540.17478-100000>