Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Jan 2021 17:22:22 +0100
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        rgrimes@freebsd.org
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 2d486ba15f33 - main - pkgbase: Move bectl to the runtime package
Message-ID:  <20210105172222.f967fd57a637287a1a3d778a@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <202101051554.105FsFL7008161@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
References:  <20210104220959.fb00d9ec75b43c3ed580ae37@bidouilliste.com> <202101051554.105FsFL7008161@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 07:54:15 -0800 (PST)
"Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:

> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:58:58 -0800 (PST)
> > "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:49:19 -0800 (PST)
> > > > "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > The branch main has been updated by manu:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=2d486ba15f3367072d631ee588192ef46687fa4b
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > commit 2d486ba15f3367072d631ee588192ef46687fa4b
> > > > > > Author:     Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org>
> > > > > > AuthorDate: 2020-12-21 15:00:02 +0000
> > > > > > Commit:     Emmanuel Vadot <manu@FreeBSD.org>
> > > > > > CommitDate: 2021-01-04 15:17:12 +0000
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >     pkgbase: Move bectl to the runtime package
> > > > > >     
> > > > > >     runtime contain what is needed to boot in single user and repair a
> > > > > >     system, bectl could be handy to have in this situation.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I would think it belongs in the zfs package,
> > > > > as unless you have zfs you do not need bectrl.
> > > > 
> > > >  There is no zfs package.
> > > 
> > > I would consider that an oversight.
> > 
> >  I don't. We don't have a ufs package for example.
> 
> My understanding of the "big idea" of pkg base is to fine
> grain feature install/removal, and I would consider support
> for things like nfs, ufs, zfs to be along those lines
> of fine grain.

 There is some limit to the fine grain.
 We started like that and we had 900+ packages, a lot of people didn't
liked that. We're now at 293 packages (68 if you don't count the -dbg,
-dev, -lib32 which won't be installed on most user machines).
 We still split part of the system into packages and I think that
putting all the nfs tools might be a good idea (the same is true for a
lot of binaries/libs present in the utilities package and a bit for
some in the runtime one).

> > 
> > > >  Having zfs is controlled by WITH/WITHOUT_ZFS and this is not related
> > > > to pkgbase.
> > > 
> > > WITH/WITHOUT are compile time constructs, pkgbase is an install time
> > > set of tools, why can there not be a zfs pkg?  
> > 
> >  pkgbase is just a reflection of what is built. There can be a zfs
> > package nothing prevent us for having one. But as said in the commit
> 
> Great, then why dont we?  And to your "ufs" above could that be
> added as well?  

 I don't think that having those binaries in their own package adds
some advantages, even worse I think it's bad from a user point of view.

 There is honestly more important work to do for pkgbase than arguing
about which packages should contain which files.
 I suggest you try pkgbase and see what you don't like about the
organization and send a mail to pkgbase@f.o after.

 Cheers,

> > runtime is the package that should contain everything needed for
> > booting to single user and repair a system so it contain zfs related
> > tools (and ufs ones).
> 
> I thought the runtime package was the bits you MUST have to
> build a running system, and nothing more.  Perhaps I have
> misunderstood.
> 
> 
> >  The idea behind runtime is that if you start upgrading and things
> > break just after it you have all the tools to repair an install.
> 
> I would of called that the "systemrepair" package.
> 
> > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >     
> > > > > >     Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27708
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  lib/libbe/Makefile  | 1 +
> > > > > >  sbin/bectl/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/lib/libbe/Makefile b/lib/libbe/Makefile
> > > > > > index 291e2438ee2a..d1fab41578bf 100644
> > > > > > --- a/lib/libbe/Makefile
> > > > > > +++ b/lib/libbe/Makefile
> > > > > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ SHLIBDIR?=	/lib
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  .include <src.opts.mk>
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +PACKAGE=	runtime
> > > > > >  LIB=		be
> > > > > >  SHLIB_MAJOR=	1
> > > > > >  SHLIB_MINOR=	0
> > > > > > diff --git a/sbin/bectl/Makefile b/sbin/bectl/Makefile
> > > > > > index 6fa84f48661d..46d43306b9ca 100644
> > > > > > --- a/sbin/bectl/Makefile
> > > > > > +++ b/sbin/bectl/Makefile
> > > > > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  .include <src.opts.mk>
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > +PACKAGE=runtime
> > > > > >  PROG=	bectl
> > > > > >  MAN=	bectl.8
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org


-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210105172222.f967fd57a637287a1a3d778a>