Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:41:26 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Steve Kiernan <stevek@juniper.net> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, luigi@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org>, zec@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [JNPR] Network stack as a module (RFC) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnm2LY8CYzqMyvRMoustOOED6kxSd-fQqBCmSKM6a-4MQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131115165210.23f82578@stevek-ubuntu> References: <CC6EF6B2.1917A%anshukla@juniper.net> <f1d8693fa83965f0d4a485a2db7e603b@novexsolutions.com> <50F868FF.5060506@networx.ch> <20131115165210.23f82578@stevek-ubuntu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Steve Kiernan <stevek@juniper.net> wrote: > This is a follow up to the request sent back in January titled "Proposal for changes to network device drivers and network stack". > > In order to make it easier to review, we will be submitting pieces to be contributed in logical blocks. > > Please review the following patch and provide feedback: > http://people.freebsd.org/~marcel/Juniper/201311/netstack-option.diff There are a few empty #ifdef blocks: such as in sys/compat/svr4/svr4_proto.h +#ifdef NETSTACK +#else +#endif +#ifdef NETSTACK +#else +#endif +#ifdef NETSTACK +#else +#endif +#ifdef NETSTACK +#else +#endif Do we need these?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnm2LY8CYzqMyvRMoustOOED6kxSd-fQqBCmSKM6a-4MQ>