Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:47:20 +1000 From: anubis <anubis357@optusnet.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.6 out performs FreeBSD?! Message-ID: <200404051947.20987.anubis357@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <001701c41a13$fd5eb640$965ca818@personalx10qdm> References: <001701c41a13$fd5eb640$965ca818@personalx10qdm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 5:10 pm, paul wrote: > I know this benchmark is a little outdated and has probably been > discussed before http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ > > but I was like wtf when I saw this, is this a legit benchmark? > Anyone out there in the "FBSD" community wanna benchmark 5.2.1 or > 4.x vs Kernel 2.6. I would be interested in seeing what a properly > tuned system would look like in this benchmark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Benchmarks dont mean dick to me. Performance is an overall package not just a single number. I want the ease of use, support and stability that you can only get from bsd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404051947.20987.anubis357>