Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 11:12:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: core group topics Message-ID: <E0wtymC-0002jm-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:49:25 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970730184224.270H-100000@Journey2.mat.net> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970730184224.270H-100000@Journey2.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.970730184224.270H-100000@Journey2.mat.net> Chuck Robey writes: : 1) Satoshi's new Makefile. His makefile has been around plenty long : enough for testing, and while several people have reported good results, : I've seen no negatives reported at all. Will it get ignored or committed? Heck, you have commit privs, so you could do it yourself :-). That's what I've been doing with the OpenBSD security fixes, just doing it when I have time, and backing things out that escape my testing procedures. Granted this is a bigger deal thing than my stuff. : ELF If we do this, we should do it in 3.0. That's the perfect time because all the libraries are changing major numbers (or most) and people would expect much disruption. This would be a major diff between 2.2.x and 3.x. Heck, at least integrate it into the tree and make it possible to build the new stuff with a DOELF=yes in /etc/make.conf. That is the next logical step, no? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0wtymC-0002jm-00>