Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 03:03:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246168] Ubuntu 20.04 QEMU Failure with nested FreeBSD bhyve Message-ID: <bug-246168-27103-9WKAxJAf0M@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-246168-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246168 --- Comment #3 from John Hartley <drum@graphica.com.au> --- Hi Rodney, thanks for looking at this bug report. Does your statement, "FreeBSD Bhyve does *not* support nested virtualization as a host" relate to this nested topology ? Layer 0 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (on Bare Metal with Intel VT-x VMX support) Layer 1 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (ie Guest of Layer 0, Host to Layer 2) Layer 2 - FreeBSD or other OS Guest I ask as bhyve wiki: https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve#Q:_Can_I_run_multiple_bhyve_hosts_under_VMware_nested_VT-x_EPT.3F Indicates that there should be ability to run nested topology as per my example: Layer 0 - VMWare or KVM with VT-x EPT Layer 1 - FreeBSD with bhyve hypervisor (ie Guest of Layer 0, Host to Layer 2) Layer 2 - FreeBSD or other OS Guest I am trying to get this model up and running, as I am wanting to test metrics collection from Layer 1 FreeBSD guest/host. Given scarcity of information I know that this is little off the beaten track, but I did find this example: https://github.com/Suhoy95/SNE-reports-2019-public/tree/4-LIA-2-xen-kvm which indicated that it had go similar nested topology going, but with Ubuntu 18.04 as Layer 0 rather than Ubuntu 20.04 as in my case. Thanks you. John Hartley. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-246168-27103-9WKAxJAf0M>