Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:57:38 +0100 From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNS=6 changes Message-ID: <20030317005738.GN3819@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpbs0a95mz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030316062315.GA75492@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpof4bcu8b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <xzpllzfctbx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030316234507.GK3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpznnuq2xw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030317001100.GM3819@elvis.mu.org> <xzpbs0a95mz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> writes: > > If you really want to see the job done fast, you could have let me > > commit the patch I posted on arch@ to begin with. Alternately, you > > could show me how your patch does things better than mine, and how the > > issues Bruce and I raised are wrong. > > Bruce wants a solution where time stopped in late 1989 or early 1990. > You want a solution which will break everything that isn't c99-ready > yet. I suggested a solution which will allow those parts of the tree > which we know are safe to take advantage of GCC's c99 support without > breaking the rest of the tree. This is generally known as "mechanism, > not policy". > > I don't suppose you've tried to build world with -std=c99 in CFLAGS? > I have. It doesn't work. You must have not read my patch correctly. The only difference it causes is for WARNS=6 programs. It does not break the tree at all, and I do have tested it. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030317005738.GN3819>